![]() ![]() Writing for the Court, Justice Alito held that PASPA violated the anti-commandeering rule of the Constitution. ![]() Although the four states (Nevada, Delaware, Montana, and Oregon) that allowed sports betting at the time that PASPA was passed were allowed to continue their programs, the law prevented the rest of the states from legalizing sports betting. The ban also applied to individuals, who were prohibited from sponsoring, operating, advertising, or promoting the same types of activities. PASPA prohibited states from sponsoring, operating, advertising, promoting, licensing, or authorizing betting schemes based on competitive sporting events. National Collegiate Athletic Association, the Court was faced with a challenge by New Jersey to the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PASPA”). In the Supreme Court case at issue, Murphy v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |